XRP remains largely absent from U.S. mainstream media coverage, a fact recently highlighted by Austin Arnold, the founder of Altcoin Daily. This observation has sparked renewed debate within the XRP community about media bias and the coin’s overall visibility.

Growing International Coverage Raises Eyebrows

Arnold’s comments came in response to increased global attention toward XRP. Notably, German outlet DER AKTIONÄR TV recently reported on Ripple’s advances in cross-border payment systems. The coverage touched on Ripple’s regulatory progress, such as clarity after the SEC lawsuit, and how XRP could serve as a bridge asset in global finance.

This kind of in-depth reporting contrasts sharply with what many perceive as relative silence from major U.S. media organizations. While international media has spotlighted XRP’s role in future investment products like futures and investment certificates, top American networks continue to focus predominantly on crypto giants like Bitcoin and Ethereum.

The XRP Community Weighs In

Arnold’s post ignited a flood of opinions from the XRP community. User Djtomt expressed an indifferent stance, suggesting XRP holders shouldn’t feel obligated to advocate for the asset. He argued that if people miss the opportunity, that’s their own responsibility.

In contrast, Ken Rasmussen offered a more speculative take, positing that big players might be deliberately downplaying XRP until it reaches a certain maturity or value point.

Others, like user Hasan, criticized the general crypto narrative, accusing mainstream reports of portraying Bitcoin as a cult phenomenon, preventing lesser-known but promising projects like XRP from receiving due recognition.

On the cautionary side, Matt Kvi warned that overly enthusiastic mainstream coverage could backfire, turning XRP into a media darling at risk of hype-driven overvaluation.

Critics Question XRP’s Relevance

Not all reactions were in support of giving XRP more visibility. Crypto commentator Cryptavocato dismissed it as an outdated layer-1 blockchain, suggesting its popularity is based more on uninformed hype than actual utility.

Meanwhile, user Shaolin Chad expressed skepticism toward Ripple’s collaboration with banks. He reflected the sentiment of decentralized purists who believe cryptocurrencies should replace rather than integrate with traditional finance systems.

Could Silence Be Strategic?

Some in the community took a contrarian view, believing XRP’s low media profile could be advantageous. LJM framed the quiet coverage as a possible tool for suppressing early hype, keeping entry prices accessible for long-term believers. GemsFinderr even predicted that XRP would remain off the mainstream radar until a major price surge forces recognition.

Community reactions reveal split opinions on media silence and XRP’s future visibility.

XRP Coverage Does Exist in U.S. Press

Despite claims of silence, XRP and Ripple have not gone entirely unnoticed in the United States. High-profile outlets like CNBC, Bloomberg, Forbes, Fortune, and FOX Business have reported on the cryptocurrency, particularly during major legal updates and company announcements.

For example, USA Today recently highlighted XRP as a smart investment for those with smaller budgets. The article praised XRP’s sound fundamentals, increasing utility, and regulatory achievements. However, it also cautioned that XRP’s established valuation may reduce the likelihood of sudden explosive growth.

Similarly, Forbes published an in-depth forecast charting XRP’s potential performance over the next half-decade. Yet, the platform has not always been favorable. A previous March 2024 article controversially referred to XRP as a “zombie” token, sparking backlash from supporters.

Related: XRP Price: $12M Max Pain for Bears

This oscillating coverage only further fuels the divide in perception. While data shows that XRP is far from ignored, its treatment compared to other digital assets remains a point of contention.