XRP Faces Banking Opposition as Ripple Targets U.S. License

XRP has taken center stage in a heated debate as Ripple intensifies its efforts to embed itself within the U.S. banking infrastructure. Ripple’s bid to secure a national banking license and gain access to the Federal Reserve’s core payment systems has drawn significant pushback from traditional banking institutions.

The uproar was triggered when the American Bankers Association (ABA) urged regulatory authorities to halt the approval process for crypto institutions, specifically targeting Ripple and similar firms. The move has provoked a sharp response from Ripple’s Chief Technology Officer, David Schwartz, who accused legacy banks of resisting forward progress out of self-interest rather than regulatory prudence.

In a recent online statement, Schwartz reflected on how established firms often aim to suppress innovation. He noted that if powerful financial incumbents had their way, they would halt advancements entirely to preserve their dominance. His comments come amid Ripple’s recent play to enhance its standing in American finance by leveraging Standard Custody, a company it acquired in 2024, to file for both a national bank charter and a master account with the Federal Reserve.

The implications of such a move are significant. A successful application would permit Ripple to bypass intermediary banks and plug directly into the U.S. central financial network. This would place it on equal footing with traditional banks in terms of accessing critical infrastructure such as real-time payment systems and central liquidity facilities.

The backlash from the traditional finance sector, especially the ABA, underscores a key concern: the growing legitimacy of blockchain-native firms like Ripple threatens the stronghold that conventional banks have long maintained. Schwartz argued that the resistance stems less from regulatory concerns and more from the fear of competition. According to him, institutions are defending their turf under the guise of maintaining systemic integrity.

This face-off is emblematic of a broader clash: whether innovative, digital-first platforms like Ripple can obtain access to financial networks traditionally reserved for long-established banks. The battle is not solely about Ripple; it taps into the evolving narrative of whether the U.S. financial framework will adapt to accommodate blockchain-based entities or continue protecting established players by restricting access.

As Ripple makes its case before the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) and the Federal Reserve, the outcome could define future standards for how blockchain companies integrate with national finance. Ripple’s initiative signals a strategic push to not only expand its operations in the United States but also challenge the exclusions that have kept cryptocurrency firms on the financial periphery.

The current regulatory friction sets the stage for a landmark decision. It will test whether U.S. financial authorities are prepared to evolve with technological progress or remain beholden to the entrenched frameworks favored by major banks. Whatever decision emerges, it will have significant consequences for the future of blockchain adoption at a systemic level, and XRP’s role in that ecosystem may be more pivotal than ever.

Related: XRP Price: $12M Max Pain for Bears

As this regulatory standoff unfolds, Ripple’s unwavering push to align itself with banking infrastructure exemplifies the broader ambition of blockchain firms to be recognized alongside legacy giants. XRP continues to be at the forefront—not just as a digital asset, but as a vehicle for challenging the barriers that define institutional finance today.